PREDICTING HSR

Before initiating treatment with abacavir
Screening for HLA-B*5701 should be performed.
Abacavir should never be initiated in patients with a positive HLA-B*5701 status, nor in patients with a negative HLA-B*5701 status who had a suspected abacavir HSR on a previous abacavir-containing regimen.


HLA-B*5701 testing must not be used as a diagnostic test after a patient has started treatment with abacavir

Clinical diagnosis of suspected hypersensitivity to abacavir remains the basis for clinical decision making.

The role of HLA-B*5701

The HLA-B*5701 allele is more common among patients who have a suspected hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir compared with those who do not, regardless of race.

No other pharmacogenetic markers have been found that identify patients at risk of abacavir hypersensitivity.

Prospective pharmacogenetic screening for HLA-B*5701 can be used to identify patients at high risk for abacavir hypersensitivity.

However, HLA-B*5701 is not always present in people who have a suspected abacavir HSR. Therefore, clinical diagnosis of suspected HSR to abacavir remains the basis of clinical decision making.

HLA-B*5701 screening for risk of abacavir HSR should never be substituted for appropriate clinical vigilance and patient management in individuals receiving abacavir.

HLA-B*5701 screening

Before initiating treatment with abacavir, screening for HLA-B*5701 should be performed.

Screening is also recommended prior to re-initiation of abacavir in patients of unknown HLA-B*5701 status who have previously tolerated abacavir.

HLA-B*5701 status must always be documented and explained to the patient prior to initiating therapy.

In HLA-B*5701–negative patients, clinical vigilance remains vital to detect any abacavir hypersensitivity at the earliest stage.

Results of pharmacogenetic tests for risk of abacavir hypersensitivity should never be used to support a drug rechallenge decision after a suspected hypersensitivity reaction.

HLA-B*5701 testing must not be used as a diagnostic test after a patient has started treatment with abacavir.

Clinical data

A number of studies have been performed to investigate whether HLA-B*5701 screening is an effective and feasible procedure to reduce the incidence of abacavir HSR.

Data from PREDICT-1 and SHAPE does not support the use of skin patch testing in routine clinical practice.

  • PREDICT-1 study

    The PREDICT-1 study (CNA106030) was a pivotal, double blinded, randomised clinical trial to establish the effectiveness of the HLA-B*5701 allele as a predictive marker for abacavir (ABC) hypersensitivity reaction (HSR).1

    1,956 ABC naive subjects randomised 1:1 in a double blinded fashion to: 1

    • Arm A) Retrospective HLA-B*5701 testing after starting ABC therapy (Controls)
    • Arm B) Prospective HLA-B*5701 screening; positive patients excluded pre- ABC therapy

    Retrospective epicutaneous patch testing (EPT) was carried out in all cases of clinically suspected ABC HSR.

    Incidence of Clinically Suspected Abacavir Hypersensitivity1

    graph

    a Intention-to-treat evaluable population.

    b Prospective screen versus control adjusted for actual strata of race, ART status, introduction of NNRTI, and concurrent PI use.

    Incidence of Immunologically Confirmed Abacavir Hypersensitivity1

    graph

    a Intention-to-treat evaluable population.

    b Prospective screen versus control adjusted for actual strata of race, ART status, introduction of NNRTI, and concurrent PI use.

    Conclusions1

    It was estimated that 48% - 61% of patients with HLA-B*5701 will develop HSR on ABC containing therapy vs. 0% to 4% of patients who do not have the allele.

  • SHAPE-2 study

    SHAPE (ABC107442) is a retrospective case-control study to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the HLA-B*5701 allele in self-reported White and Black subjects with and without suspected ABC HSR, using EPT to supplement clinical diagnosis of abacavir hypersensitivity.2

    Conclusions2

    • 100% sensitivity of HLA-B*5701 in white and black subjects with EPT confirmed ABC HSR
    • Lower sensitivity of HLA-B*5701 screening observed when ABC HSR was defined by clinical diagnosis alone
    • Not all HLA-B*5701 positive subjects had a positive EPT test result
    • Prospective HLA-B*5701 screening may reduce ABC HSR rates in white and black subjects
    • The presence of the HLA-B*5701 allele is associated with increased risk of ABC HSR, regardless of race
  • HLA-B*5701 screening data

    A limitation of the PREDICT-1 study was that investigators were blinded to subjects HLA-B*5701 status during the study, which would not be the case in clinical practice.

    Recent marketing authorisation holder (MAH) trials, which prospectively screened for the HLA-B*5701 allele and excluded subjects testing positive, more accurately reflect experience and reporting rates in clinical practice.

    MAH Sponsored Clinical Trials with prospective HLA-B*5701 screening
    ABC containing treatment group
    HSR Reporting Rate
    % (n/N)
    ASSERT (CNA109586)3 ABC/3TC + EFV 3.1 (6/192)
    ARIES (EPZ108859)4 ABC/3TC + ATV+ RTV 1 (4/517)
    ASSURE (EPZ113734)5 ABC/3TC + ATV <1 (1/199)
    SINGLE (ING114467)6 ABC/3TC + DTG <1 (1/414)
    Total   1 (12/1322)

    ABC/3TC = KIVEXA; ATV = atazanavir; DTG = dolutegravir; EFV = efavirenz; RTV = ritonavir.

NP-GBL-HVX-WCNT-220048 November 2022

Report an adverse event

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk or search for MHRA Yellowcard in the Google Play or Apple App store. Adverse events should also be reported to GlaxoSmithKline on 0800 221441.

If you are from outside the UK, you can report adverse events to GSK/ViiV by selecting your region and market, here.